Thursday, October 21, 2010

Fashion Midnight Tvstreaming

response to the article THE TIME in "crime scene private television" Heinrich Wefing

response to article in Die Zeit crime scene private television "by Heinrich Wefing

Grooming is already banned

The mixture of avoidable substantive interviews with emotional music and a pumped-up reporter, as Wefing writes, should not be confused with the debate over Internet censorship. This is about two issues that should be separated very well.
Tatort Internet deals with an important issue. It is about the so-called "grooming", ie the initiation of sexual contact with children over the Internet. A difficult issue that deserves attention in any case - would be serious in a less sensational way possible, as it makes the TV show - just because Grooming already banned in Germany. The Federal Minister of Justice emphasized this clear. To separate them
the presentation of child abuse on the Internet. Here, too, of course, has to act. According to The Association of German Internet Industry Association works to delete: min can in Germany or between 5th and 2 h and outside Germany within 2 days (August 2010) will be removed from the network. The government parties have already spoken clearly on this issue. It are different ways to effectively combat child pornography is to be achieved. We liberals have developed in the debate, a clear priority list. Chief among these is Tatvermeidung, this is still a degree of chaos. The prosecution of offenders can best be implemented with traditional investigative techniques. This requires the investigating authorities are much better equipped - with personnel and equipment - so that they can pursue promising the money. Other methods include Quick Freeze and notice and takedown. The Provider shall immediately be informed of the illegal file content which they then freeze or disconnect and use in further investigations can. This means that them for no one visible in the network. This is much better than merely to bypass a curtain to pass easily from the crime.
Victim protection is a top priority! Blocking helps no one: neither is it a crime to prevent another victim protected. Rather, the mentality of looking away and maintained the company weighed into a false security that they had not done anything. The
necessary for blocking lists with the atrocious images appeared in other European countries on short notice and are always the perpetrators as "yellow pages" of child pornography. A bad idea that this was also financed by tax money and put together by officials.
by only consistent prosecution of offenders and intelligent methods, the victims are protected. Therefore: Delete instead of lockers!

0 comments:

Post a Comment