Freezing Point For Pvc Pipe

Delete instead of blocking and in Europe!

On Monday 30 March, presented EU Commissioner for Internal Malmström a new proposal for a directive to combat child pornography. This includes all EU Member States are invited to child pornographic sites to block the Web. The new rules should take into account, among other things, technological developments and replace the EU Directive of 2004 (2004/68/JHA). A review and reevaluation

course, is basically correct, but Internet censorship is definitely the wrong way! Locks can be easily circumvented, and the CRL can be used in the worst case as a "yellow pages". The EU should concentrate on fighting to enforce international agreements in order to remove such material faster from the net. The fight against child pornography - that documented child abuse - is too important for symbolic politics.

Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger has called for the principle of "Delete instead of locks," which was agreed in the coalition agreement, already clear. I am very glad that they dealt with the issue proactively. I will support them like this. Lisbon since no Member State can prevent a single veto in the Council a project. We now need to advertise so for majorities in our neighbors. Also the EU Parliament will vote on the policy, and we will support the FDP MEPs and the European liberals like it.

- Jimmy Schulz

Mera Naam Joker Simi Garewal Scene Viedos

The 13 questions on the Internet Study

The ex-deputy Tauss provides on its website 13 questions on the future of inquiry members. Here 're at my answers.

question
first What motivated you to have to rely in this inquiry of the German Bundestag and what (s) you want to achieve your political objectives there?

Answer:
I see in the Study is a good chance to actively discuss the long-term net-political orientation of the Federal Republic not only but also a say. Accompanying the new media sub-committee, internal law and economic committee (since last year, family) I see the possibility in areas such as new protocols (IPv6), media convergence and media literacy lot on the path can be.

question
second Have you previously with "power politics", for example, with the results of the previous inquiry in 1995 - deals in 1998 and what do you think the fact that the former recommendations, for example for the reform of the Federal Data Protection Act (total reform, privacy audits, etc.) , have been implemented in the key committees never net neutrality

response
Yes, I am also with that of the first inquiry on the 1981 - employs 1983rd Both suffered the same problem: namely, that there was no driving force in parliament, the results have adopted.

That's different this time!


question
4th How do you rate your political influence to ensure the implementation of your recommendations at least possible with this inquiry?

Answer:
in the FDP group is accompanied by a whole group "AG IT and information society," the work of the Study. The networking in the AGs and AKs is cross guaranteed by all departments.


question
5th Have you ever participated in demonstrations for civil rights and against Internet censorship, such as the "Freedom not fear" against the "Zensursulagesetz" in Berlin, participated in or will you in future participate in them?

Answer:
participate in the panel of experts to TKÜV 1999 of the Federal Economics Ministry

used active against software patents since 2003:

http://eupat.ffii.org/dates/2003/europarl/09/muenchen/index. en.html

http://kwiki.ffii.org/DemoMuenchen0405PressemitteilungDe

http://www.fitug.de/debate/0411/msg00023.html

http://muenchen.ffii .org / European election / index.php


Active participation in the AK stocks from the beginning, as a speaker at all events in Munich, for example
on 2007-11-06 from about 5,000 people at the Munich Odeon Place:

http://www.myvideo.de/watch/2711146/Jimmy_Schulz_gegen_Vorratsdatenspeicherung_Teil_2

speaker at the funeral march on 2008-01-06 against data retention:

http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung .de/content/view/186/55/lang, de /

speaker at the demonstration "Freiheit white-blue" against retention
on 2008-09-20

http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/ content/view/255/55/lang, de /

speakers at the demonstration for demonstration for the freedom of AK stock:

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRYMd86_BcU&feature=related
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csZd0be5y0U&feature=related
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwFZvvymaz0&feature=related

Users Freedom not Fear in Berlin in 2008

[there has pictures of someone?]

and 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSaOuN_ESpw

"block erase instead of" Demo 2009 -06-20 in Munich:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnO-ydzp5P8

I will also take part in future demonstrations on this and other topics.


Question:
6th How do you rate "airtime" and "labels" for the Internet, as envisaged in the currently discussed youth media protection treaty JMStV)?

Answer:
balderdash!


question
7th How do you assess the fact that your party in the countries where they each (co-) governed, taking no visible platforms, for to stop this treaty?

Answer:
We have organized a few weeks ago a closed meeting with the media, political speakers from federal and state governments in Berlin on the topic and work together to find solutions to avert failures. Not all of it takes place in public.


question
8th How do you feel about Abmahnunwesen the Internet and how do you assess the fact that the treatment of this deplorable state of the original draft of the remit of your commission was taken out?

Answer:
Under the heading of consumer protection warnings specifically mentioned the topic.


question
9th How do you define "net neutrality" and sit down for such, for example, anonymizing services for a? [New]
Answer:
Unhindered [and unobserved] Transport of IP packets on the Internet. No use of Zwangsproxies, no redirection of error messages, no blocking of services, protocols and ports.
I think it is essential that everyone can move anonymously on the net. Services such as anonymous, as well as Scroogle JonDonym gate and do this. Overlay protocols such i2p also offer completely anonymous and encrypted network world whose skills go way beyond that.


question
10th Would you have in the European Parliament with the local majority against the so-called SWIFT - voted in agreement?

Answer: How
the FDP group in the EP, of course I would have voted against it.

see blog post:

http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/02/swift-abkommen-ist-vom-tisch-es-ist-ein.html



question:
11th Are you in favor of the so-called "retention" in the opinion of the Constitutional Court to quickly implement and how to evaluate the criticism by some politicians and police officials at the ruling of the Constitutional Court?

Answer:
I see no security issue.

See also:

http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/03/ein-guter-tag-fur-die-burgerrechte.html


question
12th The subject of copyright is to get a central role in your Commission. What is your principle of "open access" and to advocate government intervention in the Internet enforcement interests of the content industry, as provided for example, the draft of the ACTA agreement at international level?

Answer:
These are two questions ;-)

first Open Access must be discussed openly and find the interests of all hearing.

second ACTA is the next big challenge for civil power. ACTA
to see my blog post:

http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/02/ad-acta.html



question
13th How will you contribute to the work of the Study Commission is transparent?

Answer:
The FDP deputies have started simultaneously with the creation debate of the Study webpage open-enquete.de . In parallel, there is a Facebook page and Twitter account. We want to provide information on the one hand to inquiry publicly available, but mainly in the dialogue with interested citizens and can connect their experiences and know-how incorporated in the work of the inquiry.

- Jimmy Schulz

Gold Designs Long Chains

A good day for civil rights

The Federal Constitutional Court today declared unconstitutional the retention. This means the immediate removal of all data collected, a good day for civil rights and for freedom.

In recent years we have seen a number of disproportionate action by the state-mostly in the name of fighting terrorism. Today's ruling of the Constitutional Court sets the trend of legislation to an end. Starting and suspicion-free storage or use of the telecommunications connection data of innocent citizens, it will not now. The verdict will also have consequences for other, future legislative projects in the inner- and they are right policy to follow.

The ruling coalition of the Great Law was also significantly beyond the requirements of the EU Directive on data retention. Today, the FDP was in the clear criticism that we have represented for years, confirmed by the highest court of the Federal Republic. Even the 34,000 constitutional complaints have played their part and showed that the company is actively engaged in width and with privacy.

precipitated the Federal Constitutional Court, beginning with the massive bugging, have rejected a number of judgments, the lack of laws. However, it is extremely important that the "can rule from London" is not the norm. Constitutional legislation must be for the people's representatives. We must move away from a legal, parliamentary back to a democracy! Therefore it is imperative that we now make any trip or fall into activism, but also to analyze in the run well, whether a policy is reasonable and proportionate. As the EU Commissioner Reding has already announced that the directive 2006/24/EC on the EU level is examined again, this time on the proportionality between security and privacy. Furthermore, future steps need to be embedded in European stipulations. The FDP is always make for strong civil rights. It is unacceptable that all citizens must be subject to general suspicion. I think fighting terrorism is very important, but we can not share our basic values for risk. This can be in a free society will never be desirable.

Posted from Blogium for iPhone

- Jimmy Schulz

Tattoo On Woman's Crotch

more transparency in the ad network

yesterday Interior Minister de Maiziere made in an article for the Tagesspiegel a proposal for the possible introduction of a compulsory data letter. We welcome the target direction: more transparency in the network and more control over their own data for citizens.

data of users are widely used unscrupulously. They often do not know who holds their data and trade with them driving, and therefore can not speak again and the data collection. So it's important that Internet users are given the opportunity to be able to retrieve their data for free. This problem must be solved reasonably.

The idea of the interior minister is basically good, the so-called letter but data are difficult to enforce. Some companies are required to store data ten years, this would potentially generate a vast amount of mail, the most likely to be unwelcome to many. Alternatively, for example, appears the message of the stored personal data, together with an already consigned bill worthy of consideration. Rule over their own data, of course imposed by the state and used for information.

We need a public debate on the use of personal information: companies and government agencies need to consider are actually stored in the extent to which data must-it must become a mandatory note that this is personal data which are eminently worthy of protection.

same but more people should think about how they move around the Internet, and which tracks they want to leave behind. In cooperation with the Union we will develop an early solution.

Posted from Blogium for iPhone

- Jimmy Schulz