You learn never made ...
Over the weekend I had to learn how to be misquoted and I said can be misconstrued.
Okay but all over again: I also in the project group net neutrality of the Study Internet and digital society and in the inquiry sessions themselves, I left no doubt:
I have always advocated a preservation of network neutrality (Question 9 blog post) as important to me is the preservation of net neutrality.
Last Friday, a plenary debate on the topic held at the request of the Greens and the Left. In the post into a part of my speech was misinterpreted and placed under me, I would have said network neutrality would be socialism.
did not I say this and say do not want. This is contrary to my position on net neutrality.
I have a statement of my previous speaker Halina Wawzyniak (The Left) the following reaction in her speech said. "We want to freeze the net neutrality based
clear criteria These are formulated in our application, we do ask for your consent. . If that is socialism, it is socialism, but it hurts anything. " Minutes of the meeting Page 75
My response was referring to the statement, "Socialism in the net harms nothing" and was as follows: "But we are not in agreement about the ways how do we get there. This is especially true because the left here is a "socialist-Internet calling. Sorry, but we have
in the world already, namely in China. That does none of us. I'm sorry. In this we are all here we all agree. " minutes of the meeting page 78
The seems too smart for some to have been Miss saying from the context. I have learned this and will respect more in the future care that my comments are clear.
-. Jimmy Schulz 
0 comments:
Post a Comment