The 13 questions on the Internet Study
The ex-deputy Tauss provides on its website 13 questions on the future of inquiry members. Here 're at my answers.
question
first What motivated you to have to rely in this inquiry of the German Bundestag and what (s) you want to achieve your political objectives there?
Answer:
I see in the Study is a good chance to actively discuss the long-term net-political orientation of the Federal Republic not only but also a say. Accompanying the new media sub-committee, internal law and economic committee (since last year, family) I see the possibility in areas such as new protocols (IPv6), media convergence and media literacy lot on the path can be.
question
second Have you previously with "power politics", for example, with the results of the previous inquiry in 1995 - deals in 1998 and what do you think the fact that the former recommendations, for example for the reform of the Federal Data Protection Act (total reform, privacy audits, etc.) , have been implemented in the key committees never net neutrality
response
Yes, I am also with that of the first inquiry on the 1981 - employs 1983rd Both suffered the same problem: namely, that there was no driving force in parliament, the results have adopted.
That's different this time!
question
4th How do you rate your political influence to ensure the implementation of your recommendations at least possible with this inquiry?
Answer:
in the FDP group is accompanied by a whole group "AG IT and information society," the work of the Study. The networking in the AGs and AKs is cross guaranteed by all departments.
question
5th Have you ever participated in demonstrations for civil rights and against Internet censorship, such as the "Freedom not fear" against the "Zensursulagesetz" in Berlin, participated in or will you in future participate in them?
Answer:
participate in the panel of experts to TKÜV 1999 of the Federal Economics Ministry
used active against software patents since 2003:
http://eupat.ffii.org/dates/2003/europarl/09/muenchen/index. en.html
http://kwiki.ffii.org/DemoMuenchen0405PressemitteilungDe
http://www.fitug.de/debate/0411/msg00023.html
http://muenchen.ffii .org / European election / index.php
Active participation in the AK stocks from the beginning, as a speaker at all events in Munich, for example
on 2007-11-06 from about 5,000 people at the Munich Odeon Place:
http://www.myvideo.de/watch/2711146/Jimmy_Schulz_gegen_Vorratsdatenspeicherung_Teil_2
speaker at the funeral march on 2008-01-06 against data retention:
http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung .de/content/view/186/55/lang, de /
speaker at the demonstration "Freiheit white-blue" against retention
on 2008-09-20
http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/ content/view/255/55/lang, de /
speakers at the demonstration for demonstration for the freedom of AK stock:
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRYMd86_BcU&feature=related
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csZd0be5y0U&feature=related
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwFZvvymaz0&feature=related
Users Freedom not Fear in Berlin in 2008
[there has pictures of someone?]
and 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSaOuN_ESpw
"block erase instead of" Demo 2009 -06-20 in Munich:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnO-ydzp5P8
I will also take part in future demonstrations on this and other topics.
Question:
6th How do you rate "airtime" and "labels" for the Internet, as envisaged in the currently discussed youth media protection treaty JMStV)?
Answer:
balderdash!
question
7th How do you assess the fact that your party in the countries where they each (co-) governed, taking no visible platforms, for to stop this treaty?
Answer:
We have organized a few weeks ago a closed meeting with the media, political speakers from federal and state governments in Berlin on the topic and work together to find solutions to avert failures. Not all of it takes place in public.
question
8th How do you feel about Abmahnunwesen the Internet and how do you assess the fact that the treatment of this deplorable state of the original draft of the remit of your commission was taken out?
Answer:
Under the heading of consumer protection warnings specifically mentioned the topic.
question
9th How do you define "net neutrality" and sit down for such, for example, anonymizing services for a? [New]
Answer:
Unhindered [and unobserved] Transport of IP packets on the Internet. No use of Zwangsproxies, no redirection of error messages, no blocking of services, protocols and ports.
I think it is essential that everyone can move anonymously on the net. Services such as anonymous, as well as Scroogle JonDonym gate and do this. Overlay protocols such i2p also offer completely anonymous and encrypted network world whose skills go way beyond that.
question
10th Would you have in the European Parliament with the local majority against the so-called SWIFT - voted in agreement?
Answer: How
the FDP group in the EP, of course I would have voted against it.
see blog post:
http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/02/swift-abkommen-ist-vom-tisch-es-ist-ein.html
question:
11th Are you in favor of the so-called "retention" in the opinion of the Constitutional Court to quickly implement and how to evaluate the criticism by some politicians and police officials at the ruling of the Constitutional Court?
Answer:
I see no security issue.
See also:
http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/03/ein-guter-tag-fur-die-burgerrechte.html
question
12th The subject of copyright is to get a central role in your Commission. What is your principle of "open access" and to advocate government intervention in the Internet enforcement interests of the content industry, as provided for example, the draft of the ACTA agreement at international level?
Answer:
These are two questions ;-)
first Open Access must be discussed openly and find the interests of all hearing.
second ACTA is the next big challenge for civil power. ACTA
to see my blog post:
http://jimmy-schulz.blogspot.com/2010/02/ad-acta.html
question
13th How will you contribute to the work of the Study Commission is transparent?
Answer:
The FDP deputies have started simultaneously with the creation debate of the Study webpage open-enquete.de . In parallel, there is a Facebook page and Twitter account. We want to provide information on the one hand to inquiry publicly available, but mainly in the dialogue with interested citizens and can connect their experiences and know-how incorporated in the work of the inquiry.
0 comments:
Post a Comment